Abstract
<jats:p>Digital transformation has emerged as one of the most influential forces reshaping contemporary societies, fundamentally altering economic structures, governance models, and patterns of social interaction. Within this broader transformation, the education system occupies a uniquely central position, as it is simultaneously affected by digital change and responsible for preparing individuals to navigate the digital age. The integration of digital technologies into educational processes has redefined teaching methods, learning environments, institutional structures, and the relationship between educators and learners. Technologies including artificial intelligence, big data analytics, cloud computing, virtual learning environments, and mobile learning platforms have created unprecedented opportunities for personalized instruction, global collaboration, and expanded access to knowledge. However, digital transformation in education extends well beyond technological adoption; it represents a profound cultural, pedagogical, and institutional shift that requires rethinking traditional educational paradigms, redefining the role of educators, and cultivating new competencies among learners. The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically accelerated this process, exposing both the potential and the limitations of digital education systems worldwide. This article examines the concept of digital transformation within the education system through qualitative analysis informed by theoretical frameworks including connectivism, constructivism, and the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge model. The study traces the historical development of educational technology, analyzes the opportunities and risks associated with digitalization, evaluates its impact on teaching methods, institutional management, and learning outcomes, and discusses the ethical, social, and cultural dimensions of digital education. The article argues that successful digital transformation in education requires a holistic strategy integrating technological infrastructure, pedagogical innovation, institutional reform, and ethical responsibility.</jats:p>