Robertsonian translocations in Danish sika deer (Cervus nippon). Markers for absent F1-hybridization with red deer (C. elaphus) and potential models for selection, speciation and infertility.

<jats:p>EU has reclassified the sika deer (Cervus nippon) as an undesirable invasive species based on reports that hybridization with the indigenous red deer (C. elaphus) may produce fertile offspring. Since sika-derived DNA previosuly introduced into the red deer population (introgression) cannot be removed, the crucial question is whether new (F1) hybridisation occur. To address this, we analysed the chromosomes in 56 sika and 22 red deer. All red deer had a chromosome number 2n=68. In contrast, the chromosome number in sika ranged from 64 to 67, due to the variable presence of two sika-specific Robertsonian translocations (ROB1,ROB2). In the free-ranging sika population in Jutland, &gt;90% of the sika deer were homozygote for at least one of these ROBs, excluding that they could be F1-hybrids. Moreover, ROB2 was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, further supporting the absence of gene flow between the two species. In contrast, ROB1 was in Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium, suggesting negative fitness of heterozygotes, including potential F1-hybrids. In Jaegersborg Deer Park, the eight examined sika deer had the same genotype (absence of ROB1, homozygosity of ROB2), supporting that it is a founder population which may have been isolated for ~100 years. Again, none of these can be F1-hybrids due to the homozygosity of ROB2. We conclude that F1-hybridisation between sika and red deer either does not occur or occur very rarely in Denmark. The study establish the Danish sika-populations as unique models for adressing important biological questions: What underlies the absence of hybridisation? Why are ROBs frequent in sika deer but not in the closely related red deer? How fast do new species/subspecies develop in isolated founder populations? Which factors determine, that some ROBs have little heterozygous effects, whereas others are selected against, with implications for the role of ROBs as genetic barriers promoting speciation, and for fertility problems in some human ROB carriers.</jats:p>