Network- and Measure-Specific Mid-Term Reliability of Multi-Echo Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging on a Compact 3 Tesla Scanner

<jats:p>Introduction: Understanding mid-term test-retest reliability and within-subject variability is important for interpreting changes observed in longitudinal and intervention studies. The reliability of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) is known to vary across measures and brain regions. However, how reliability differs across functional networks and connectivity- and amplitude-based measures, and whether multi-echo acquisition and processing modify these patterns, remain incompletely characterized. Methods: Twenty-two healthy volunteers underwent two rs-fMRI sessions 15.7 ± 4.0 days apart on a Compact 3T scanner. Multi-echo, middle-echo, and independently acquired single-echo datasets were compared, with multi-echo independent component analysis additionally evaluated as a denoising approach. Functional connectivity (FC) and three amplitude-based measures were evaluated using the Schaefer 400 parcellation. Reliability was systematically assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), within-subject standard deviation (wSD), and systematic bias at edge or regional, and network levels. Results: Acquisition-dependent differences in reliability were generally modest. Multi-echo acquisition and processing increased functional connectivity strength and the magnitude of amplitude-based measures and improved inferior cortical coverage, but these enhancements did not consistently translate into substantially higher ICC or lower wSD. In contrast, reliability showed clear network-dependent differences. FC reliability varied markedly across network pairs and was not explained by connectivity strength alone; pairs involving the default mode and control networks generally showed more favorable profiles than several somatomotor and visual network pairs. Fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) also showed network-dependent reliability, with the most favorable regional reproducibility observed in the default mode and control networks and lower reproducibility in the somatomotor and visual networks. Conclusion: These findings provide practical mid-term reliability benchmarks for rs-fMRI on a Compact 3T scanner and show that measurement stability varies more clearly across measures and functional networks than across acquisition approaches.</jats:p>