Abstract
<jats:p>Background Substrate mapping using multielectrode catheters is increasingly used for post-myocardial infarction (MI) ventricular tachycardia (VT) avoiding repeated VT induction and mapping during VT. However, these catheters may mechanically induce ventricular arrhythmias with hemodynamic compromise. This study compares pro-arrhythmogenicity between single-tip and multi-spline catheters during functional substrate mapping. Methods Thirty post-MI patients (age 68±8 years, 97% male, LVEF 40% [IQR 33-46]) referred for VT ablation at two centers (2021-2024) underwent endocardial mapping during baseline rhythm in random order with both a multi-spline catheter (Octaray™, n=4; Pentaray™, n=26) and a single-tip QDOT™ catheter. The protocol was prematurely terminated if (i) two mechanically induced VTs required ECV, (ii) recurrent ATP-treated mechanical VTs caused hemodynamic compromise, or (iii) excessive mechanically induced ectopy impaired catheter contact. Mapping time, point density, and mechanically induced arrhythmias were assessed. Results Multi-spline catheters enabled faster mapping (26±9 vs 60±16 minutes, p<0.001) with more acquired points (p<0.001). VTs were more frequently mechanically induced with multi-spline catheters (median 2 [IQR 1-4] vs 0 [0-3], p<0.05) and these VTs were faster (304ms, IQR 292-320] vs 373ms, IQR [316-405], p=0.01) and degenerated more often into VF (3 vs. 0). Overall, 17 patients (57%) experienced at least one mechanically induced VT; seven (23%) required cardioversion, and mapping was prematurely terminated in eight (27%), all while using multi-spline catheters. Conclusion Multi-spline catheters allow rapid substrate mapping but with substantial risk of mechanically induced arrhythmias, requiring premature termination of substrate mapping because of safety concerns. Their use in post-MI VT ablation warrants careful risk?benefit assessment.</jats:p>