Abstract
<jats:p>Artificial-intelligence agents propose drug-discovery hypotheses faster than experiments can test them, yet their conclusions are rarely verified, against the underlying biology, the predicted perturbation, or the agent's own scoring logic. We close this verification gap with an agentic framework built on three verifiers. First, PACE, a phenotype verifier, resolves immune aging into ten directionally scored, cell-type-resolved gene-set modules, selected for cross-cohort stability across four PBMC cohorts, and outperforms five established aging clocks in an independent in-house aging cohort of 434 elderly donors. Second, CellQ, a virtual-cell verifier built with multi-modal LLM, compresses each single-cell transcriptome into eight discrete tokens aligned to a language model's vocabulary through residual vector quantization; it attains state-of-the-art perturbation prediction and uniquely resolves the weak, module-level shifts that differential-expression recovery misses. Third, an Analyzer-Planner-Auditor agent verifies its own scoring logic: screening 110 compounds in primary human PBMCs, it found aged-down modules more reversible than aged-up modules and revised its objective from an equal-weight mean to a balance-constrained minimum, a self-correction that generalized to an independent 13-compound T-cell assay. By verifying its predictions and its own objective against experiment, the framework points beyond hypothesis-generating AI toward self-correcting AI scientists whose objectives could continuously evolve.</jats:p>