Abstract
<jats:p>The aim of this article is to examine the extent to which the principle of public examination of cases can be legally limited, as well as to elucidate instances where such limitations are possible but not legally sanctioned. Specifically, it addresses situations within the framework of the Administrative Procedure Code of the Republic of Armenia where there arises a necessity to simultaneously conduct case examination through written procedures while extending the in camera hearing regime. The objective of the study is to explore the feasibility and implementation of both written procedures and in camera hearings, not solely on a theoretical basis as a potential complete restriction of the constitutionally enshrined principle of publicity, but also to assess their practical implications, including possible negative effects. Methodologically, the research employs logical analysis, formal jurisprudence, and analytical techniques to describe, classify, and identify the features of legal concepts. The findings of the study indicate that while such scenarios are theoretically conceivable, they pose challenges both in theory and practice. Consequently, a recommendation is put forward for amendments to the Administrative Procedure Code of the Republic of Armenia to address these challenges effectively.</jats:p>