Abstract
<jats:p><p>Sometimes management books achieve a clear-cut distinction between <b>strategy</b> and <b>tactics</b>.</p><p>Seldom they include the <b>business model</b> as a <i>third</i> competitiveness driver.</p><p>And never so far, has the <b>theory of business</b> been considered as a <i>fourth</i> required performance vector, different from all other three.</p><p>However, <b>organizational optimization</b> requires all four: the <i>why, where, what</i> and <i>how</i>.</p><p>The <b>theory of business</b> (Drucker) is the <i>why</i> the company makes sense. The reality assumptions the organization is grounded upon. What it is paid for.</p><p>The <b>business model</b> (Porter) is the <i>what</i>: the basic pillars of a firm’s organization. How it transforms client satisfaction into value for itself.</p><p><b>Strategy</b> (Joffre) is the <i>where</i>: the choice of 1) geographical areas; 2) industries; and 3) (within them of) segments.</p><p>And <b>tactics</b> is the <i>how</i>, respecting to the nine functional areas from marketing (Kotler) to human resources; to how to advertise; how to motivate; etc.</p><p>Four inferences follow:</p><p></p><ol><li>All four drivers are necessary conditions, none sufficient;</li><li>They interrelate, some impacting on others;</li><li>They must fit reinforcing each other; and</li><li>They should be periodically reviewed (under a sequence of steps).</li></ol><p>This is illustrated by the book’s <b>detailed examples</b> of e.g. Nike, Dollar Shave Club, Spotify, SpaceX, Vendôme, Sears, IBM, Apple Music, McDonald’s, Marks & Spencer, Canva, SolarCity, Farfetch, etc.</p><p>The <b>fundamental message</b> is that neglect of any of the four drivers brings <i>efficiency (doing things right – the Phronesis of Aristotle)</i> at the cost of <i>lower effectiveness (doing the right things – the Chokhmah of Solomon).</i></p><p>With more and more resources producing less and less, <b>underperformance will follow.</b></p></jats:p>