Abstract
<jats:p>In the context of martial law and the subsequent imperative for post-war recovery, the government of Ukraine has prioritized industrial parks (IPs) as a key instrument for business relocation, foreign direct investment (FDI) attraction, and the structural transformation of the national economy towards high-value-added processing. As of December 2025, the official Register of Industrial Parks includes 115 objects; however, a critical analysis of qualitative performance indicators reveals a stark disparity: only approximately one-third of these registered entities demonstrate signs of tangible economic activity. This disconnect creates a classic “market for lemons” scenario characterized by profound information asymmetry, where potential investors cannot readily distinguish between viable industrial sites and “paper parks”. This article proposes a comprehensive rating methodology (scoring system) for industrial parks, grounded in the principles of Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development (ISID) and Narrative Economics. The proposed approach integrates quantitative economic indicators with qualitative narrative markers to assess the “virality” and credibility of industrial park projects. The practical significance of the proposed rating lies in its ability to transform the investment climate from a state of uncertainty to one of measurable transparency. By providing a structured scoring system based on the synthesis of institutional stability, infrastructure readiness, and narrative strength, the study offers a tool for government agencies to optimize state support and for investors to mitigate risks. The results demonstrate that the application of such a rating can effectively eliminate information asymmetry, fostering a more resilient and attractive industrial landscape in post-war Ukraine.</jats:p>