Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Non-state armed groups—rebels, guerrillas, militias, liberation movements—not only fight for state power but also for international legitimacy. Why are some armed groups successful in turning the power of the gun into legitimate authority that is internationally recognized whereas others fail? Contributing to a vibrant scholarly debate, this book is the first comparative study of armed groups that try to gain international legitimacy. It analyses how and when these attempts are successful. The volume presents a new framework for analysing the politics of legitimation that evolve around armed groups. Based on practice theory and global history, it highlights the interaction of practices and publics in the process of legitimation and introduces four different historical times, spanning from 1945 to the present, that have set different structural conditions for armed groups’ pursuit of international legitimacy. The book encompasses in-depth case studies on Indonesia, Vietnam, Western Sahara, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Uganda, Angola, Palestine, Afghanistan, and Libya. With these selected case studies written by experts on the respective contexts, the book furthermore suggests a research strategy of ‘reiterative case comparison’, bridging the gap between political science, history, and sociology. This volume advances a new theoretical understanding of armed groups as international actors that co-shape international politics and as forces with a genuine quest for legitimacy, that allows us new insights into the fabric of international relations.</jats:p>